Due Diligence and Ongoing Monitoring

 View Only

Welcome to the Due Diligence and Ongoing Monitoring Community. Here you will be able to network, collaborate, and see the latest discussions that can help you in this area. Note: You will need to Sign In to join in the discussions and access resources. 

About Due Diligence and Ongoing Monitoring: Whether you’re vetting a new vendor or following up on an existing vendor, performing due diligence is necessary to determine if a vendor is a good fit for your organization. Ongoing monitoring is a regulatory expectation, an overall sound business practice and can lead to discovering risk that would have otherwise gone unnoticed.

Latest Discussion Posts

  • We generally include the following in our document requests: " If you prefer not to disclose some of the requested documentation, please provide a written explanation so that we may provide it to our regulators." More

  • Profile Picture

    SOC Reports: When Vendors Do Not Have One

    This message was posted by a user wishing to remain anonymous What is acceptable documentation in leu of a SOC report when a vendor does not have a SOC, such as a privately owned business? More

  • Nicole, The merger, rebrand, acquisition depends on how and who owns the controls for the due diligence. Rebranding is generally a simple name change, nothing in the underlying control framework changes. Therefore, updates to your database regarding ... More

    1 person likes this.
  • Nicole, you will need to take your lead from your vendor on which due diligence to use and when it is available for mergers, acquisitions (M/A), and rebrands. Those are determined by the time of year the event occurred and whether the products involved ... More

  • I'm interested in hearing how others account for third-party relationships that have rebranded, merged, or been acquired? Specifically, when a third-party changes name or ownership: From which entity do you obtain due diligence (legacy name vs. new ... More

Polls