I am in agreement with the prior response. When we identify that a supplier has an impact on our company's SOX (i.e. accuracy of financial reporting), we request and review the supplier's SOC 1 report. Depending on if other risk criteria are present (i.e. the supplier has access to confidential information), we may need to review a SOC 2 as well. If no SOC report is available, then we document the internal controls that our organization has put into place.
Original Message:
Sent: 01-16-2024 11:21 AM
From: Aaron Kirkpatrick
Subject: SOX Compliance Requirements for Your SaaS Solution Providers
Hi Stuart –
One way we see our customers incorporating vendor SOX compliance into their programs is by reviewing SOC reports, and more typically, SOC 1 reports as their purpose is to review internal controls over financial reporting. Section 404 of SOX concerns such internal controls over financial reporting; thus SOC 1 reports assist with SOX compliance. Vendors with impact to your internal controls over financial reporting should have a SOC 1 report, though that may not always be the case. In conversations I've had with different audit firms, I've received differing opinions on the acceptance of SOC 2 reports where a SOC 1 report would be more appropriate. That said, a SOC 2 should be better than no SOC report at all. We're always interested in hearing how others are handling these scenarios, so I look forward to seeing other responses as well.